|
JMET 2004 was very much on the expected lines with 4 sections
and more importantly, without any dreaded General Awareness
questions. The paper was for 150 questions with 1 mark
for every correct answer and -1/4 for every wrong answer.
Pattern of JMET 2004
Number of Sections : 4
Marks for correct answer : 1
Marks for wrong answer : - 1/4
Total number of questions : 150
Total time allotted : 120 minutes
|
Sections |
Description |
No. of questions |
Ideal no. of attempts
and time |
|
I |
Verbal Communication |
40 |
35-40 questions in 25 min. |
|
II |
Logical Reasoning |
40 |
30-35 questions in 35 min. |
|
III |
Quantitative Ability |
40 |
8-12 questions in 30 min. |
|
IV |
Data Interpretation |
30 |
17-20 questions in 30 min. |
|
Total |
|
150 |
120 minutes |
An ideal number of attempts in
this paper would be close to 90 to 100 questions with
a strike rate of about 80% to 85%.
Expected ranks for different
score levels
|
Ranks |
Net Marks |
|
Top
100 |
72+ |
|
100
- 500 |
65-72 |
|
500
- 1000 |
58-65 |
Students with a net score of 65+ can expect to get interview
calls from IIT Mumbai.
Analysis of the Paper
Since IITs give ranks in JMET, it is expected that there
will be no sectional cutoffs and maximizing the score
should have been the top priority for students who had
read the instructions carefully. Also, since the negative
mark was -1/4 for every wrong answer and there were
only 4 choices for every question, a student could have
taken more chances guessing in this exam.
Section I - Verbal Communication
While this section was easier compared
to CAT, it was nevertheless slightly more difficult
than last year’s JMET. There were two RC passages of
approximately 400 words and with 8 questions each. The
passages were based on “Communication and “Intellectual
Capital” and most of the questions were easy and direct.
There were also 6 easy fill-in-the-blank questions.
The questions on correct usage of phrase, analogies,
synonyms, and antonyms also included questions of medium-to-high
level of difficulty in addition to the easy ones. A
good student would have attempted 35-40 questions and
a net score of 30 plus can be expected for a student
in the top 100.
Section
II - Logical Reasoning
This section had questions
on paragraph forming, syllogisms, data sufficiency,
critical reasoning, and 2 sets of puzzles along other
logical ability questions. The section as a whole can
be termed as being of easy-medium level of difficulty
and a good student would have attempted 30 plus questions
and got a net score of 20 plus.
Section III - Quantitative Ability
True to the expectation from
the IITs, the section contained lots of pure math questions
along with arithmetic ones and would have stumped quite
a few. However, as has been mentioned earlier, the 'expected
to perform equally in all sections' caveat was conspicuously
absent and hence not scoring very high in this section
may not come in way of getting a good rank in JMET.
A very good student can expect to get about 10 plus
marks in this section. But scoring around 6 to 7 would
have been sufficient in a section as difficult as this.
Section IV - Data Interpretation
This section had 7 sets of
questions with 4 to 5 questions in each set. This included
bar graphs, line graphs, pie-charts, and combinations
of all these representations. 3 of these sets were relatively
easy and a score of 15 plus in this section can be considered
good.
Click here
to see JMET 2003 Analysis

|