Management Resources  
Upload Resume  |  Discussion Forum  |  Site Map  |  User Login  
                                        Exam Analysis > JMET 2004 - Pattern and Analysis


JMET 2004 was very much on the expected lines with 4 sections and more importantly, without any dreaded General Awareness questions. The paper was for 150 questions with 1 mark for every correct answer and -1/4 for every wrong answer.

Pattern of JMET 2004

Number of Sections : 4
Marks for correct answer : 1
Marks for wrong answer : - 1/4
Total number of questions : 150
Total time allotted : 120 minutes

Sections
Description
No. of questions
Ideal no. of attempts and time
I
Verbal Communication
40
35-40 questions in 25 min.
II
Logical Reasoning
40
30-35 questions in 35 min.
III
Quantitative Ability
40
8-12 questions in 30 min.
IV
Data Interpretation
30
17-20 questions in 30 min.
Total
150
120 minutes

An ideal number of attempts in this paper would be close to 90 to 100 questions with a strike rate of about 80% to 85%.

Expected ranks for different score levels

Ranks
Net Marks
Top 100
72+
100 - 500
65-72
500 - 1000
58-65


Students with a net score of 65+ can expect to get interview calls from IIT Mumbai.

Analysis of the Paper

Since IITs give ranks in JMET, it is expected that there will be no sectional cutoffs and maximizing the score should have been the top priority for students who had read the instructions carefully. Also, since the negative mark was -1/4 for every wrong answer and there were only 4 choices for every question, a student could have taken more chances guessing in this exam.

Section I - Verbal Communication

While this section was easier compared to CAT, it was nevertheless slightly more difficult than last year’s JMET. There were two RC passages of approximately 400 words and with 8 questions each. The passages were based on “Communication and “Intellectual Capital” and most of the questions were easy and direct. There were also 6 easy fill-in-the-blank questions. The questions on correct usage of phrase, analogies, synonyms, and antonyms also included questions of medium-to-high level of difficulty in addition to the easy ones. A good student would have attempted 35-40 questions and a net score of 30 plus can be expected for a student in the top 100.

Section II - Logical Reasoning

This section had questions on paragraph forming, syllogisms, data sufficiency, critical reasoning, and 2 sets of puzzles along other logical ability questions. The section as a whole can be termed as being of easy-medium level of difficulty and a good student would have attempted 30 plus questions and got a net score of 20 plus.

Section III - Quantitative Ability

True to the expectation from the IITs, the section contained lots of pure math questions along with arithmetic ones and would have stumped quite a few. However, as has been mentioned earlier, the 'expected to perform equally in all sections' caveat was conspicuously absent and hence not scoring very high in this section may not come in way of getting a good rank in JMET. A very good student can expect to get about 10 plus marks in this section. But scoring around 6 to 7 would have been sufficient in a section as difficult as this.

Section IV - Data Interpretation

This section had 7 sets of questions with 4 to 5 questions in each set. This included bar graphs, line graphs, pie-charts, and combinations of all these representations. 3 of these sets were relatively easy and a score of 15 plus in this section can be considered good.

Click here to see JMET 2003 Analysis


 

 
Google