|
IRMA
is not known to give too many surprises and this year's
paper was no different. In fact, if anything, the predictability
of the paper has gone up considerably and hence students
who have written this exam after going through the replica
of IRMA paper given by T.I.M.E. would have found this
very comfortable to attempt.
The paper consisted of 200 questions and the time allotted
for the same was 2 hours. As usual, there were 5 choices
for each question - with 1 mark for every correct answer
and -1/4 mark for every wrong answer.
The paper pattern is as follows:
|
Sections |
Description |
No.
of questions |
Ideal
no. of attempts |
|
I |
Verbal Ability
Reading Comprehension |
15
25 |
35 in 25 minutes |
|
II |
Quantitative Ability
Data Interpretation
Data Sufficiency |
50 |
30 in 40 minutes |
|
III |
Reasoning |
50 |
30 in 40 minutes |
|
IV |
Issues of Social Concern |
60 |
35-45 in 15 minutes |
An ideal number of attempts in this paper would have
been close to 135+ questions.
Expected Cutoffs
Section I - 18-20
Section II - 18-20
Section III - 18-20
Section IV - 20+
Overall Cutoff - 85+ for a call from IRMA
Analysis
of Sections
Section-I
This section was the easiest section
in the entire paper. This consisted of Reading Comprehension
(2 passages - including questions on Synonyms and Antonyms),
Fill-in-the-Blanks and Cloze passage. In Reading Comprehension,
questions followed only at the end of both the passages.
Students need not have read both the passages first
before attempting the questions. A better approach could
have been to read the first passage, attempt questions
related to it, then move to the second passage and attempt
questions related to it. The fill-in-the-blank and cloze
passage questions required the student to know the correct
usage of words which are in vogue and would have been
very easy for a good student of English. A good student
would have attempted almost all the questions in about
25 minutes and got a score of 20+.
Section-II
This section had questions on DI and
DS along with the normal problem solving questions.
Most of the questions in this section can be termed
to be of easy to average level of difficulty. A good
student would have attempted 30 plus questions in 40
minutes and could have got a score of 20+.
Section-III
Reasoning section has the usual controversial questions
on Strong Argument/Weak Argument along with questions
in Inferences, Data Interpretation and Data Sufficiency
in reasoning. This section had a lot of attemptable/solvable
questions and the only constraint in getting marks in
this section would be the time available. By allotting
close to 40 minutes, a good student would have attempted
30 plus questions getting a net score of at least 18-20.
Section IV
Issues
of social concern, is a section which is unique to IRMA.
This time too the paper has questions ranging from all
areas of social concern. As expected, many students
have struggled to attempt about 35 questions. A good
score would be anything more than 20 net.
Click here
to see IRMA 2003 Analysis
|