|
IRMA is not known to give surprises and this year's
paper was no different from the papers of yesteryears.
In fact, if anything, the predictability of the paper
has gone up considerably and hence students who have
written this exam after going through the replica of
IRMA paper given by T.I.M.E. would have found this very
comfortable to attempt.
The paper consisted of 200 questions and the time allotted
for the same was 2 hours. As usual, there were 5 choices
for each question - with 1 mark for every correct answer
and -1/4 mark for every wrong answer.
The paper pattern is as follows:
|
Sections |
Description |
No. of questions |
Ideal no. of attempts |
| I |
Verbal Ability
Reading Comprehension |
30
10 |
35 in 25 minutes |
|
II |
Quantitative Ability
Data Interpretation
Data Sufficiency |
25
20
5 |
30 in 40 minutes |
III |
Reasoning |
50 |
30 in 40 minutes |
| IV |
Issues of Social Concern |
60 |
35-45 in 15 minutes |
An ideal number of attempts in
this paper would have been close to 135+ questions.
Expected Cutoffs
Section I - 22-24
Section II - 18-20
Section III - 18-20
Section IV - 15-20
Overall Cutoff - 85+ for a call from IRMA
Analysis of
Sections
Section-I
This section was
the easiest section in the entire paper. This consisted
of Cloze passage, Fill-in-the-blanks, Sentence correction,
Paragraph forming and Reading Comprehension (one passage).
The reading comprehension and paragraph forming questions
were very easy and so were the sentence correction questions.
The fill-in-the-blank and cloze passage questions required
the student to know the correct usage of words which
are in vogue and would have been very easy for a good
student of English. A good student would have attempted
almost all the questions in about 25 minutes and got
a score of 25+.
Section-II
This section had 4 DI sets and 5 questions of DS along
with the normal problem solving questions. Except for
2 sets of DI, which were lengthy to solve all other
questions in the section can be termed as to be of easy
to average difficulty. A good student would have attempted
30 plus questions in 40 minutes and could have made
a 20+ score.
Section-III
Reasoning section has the usual controversial questions
on Strong Argument/Weak Argument, Implications, and
Data Sufficiency in reasoning. The section had a lot
of attemptable/solvable questions and the only constraint
to getting marks in this section would be the time available.
By allotting close to 40 minutes, a good student would
have attempted 30 plus questions getting at least a
20+ net score.
Section IV
Issues of social concern, is a section which is unique
to IRMA. This time too the paper has questions ranging
from all areas of social concern including agriculture,
rural economy and finance, people and places in news,
WTO and the like. A person who has gone through these
areas would have found this section do-able. However,
as expected, many students have struggled to attempt
about 35 questions (though time availability was not
the culprit!). A good score would be anything more than
15+ net.

|