|
CAT2004 Test Pattern
No. of Sections : 3
Total No. of Questions : 123
Section-wise time limit: No
Level of Negative marking: Not specified on test booklet
|
Test Area/s |
Section |
No. of Questions |
Marks per Question |
Total Marks |
|
DI/DS/Reasoning |
Subsection
I-A
Subsection I-B
Total |
26
12
38 |
1
2
- |
26
24
50 |
|
Quant |
Subsection
II-A
Subsection II-B
Total |
20
15
35 |
1
2
- |
20
34
50 |
|
RC/Verbal |
Subsection
III-A
Subsection III-B
Total |
10
35
5
50 |
0.5
1
2
- |
5
35
10
50 |
|
Total |
123 |
- |
150 |
CAT2004 Analysis
What a shocker it was! The IIMs truly lived up to their
reputation of giving surprises in CAT papers. A lot
of students were shaken up when they saw that each section
had two sub-sections. They were in for more of such
treatment when they realised that there were some questions
with one mark each and some questions with two marks
each.
While CAT has never before given different marks to
different questions, this year's pattern of giving some
questions separately with two marks each should have
worked in your favour because the test-setters themselves
were identifying difficult questions for you. (Of
course, there were a few half-mark questions too in
the verbal/RC questions) Do not worry that you will
lose more marks if you leave out the two-mark questions
- you have to score as many marks as possible in the
time available. Your best bet in such a scenario is
that you focus mainly on the one-mark questions. And,
most of the two-mark questions were, in fact, difficult.
A lot of them were difficult not only because of their
higher conceptual difficulty level but also because
of the time that they take to be solved. But, you should
have certainly gone through the two-mark questions to
see if you could have cracked a couple of them without
spending more-than proportionate time on such questions.
However, since it is relative performance that matters
to students, the absolute score does not matter at the
end of the day. If you have kept your cool, you would
have done the easy questions - even if they were few
in number in the entire paper.
What about negative marking? As usual, the paper does
not specify the level of negative marking. Earlier,
the negative marking was one-third for every wrong answer.
A logical assumption for this year's negative marking
can be that it will be one-third for the one-mark questions
and two-third for the two-mark questions. But, one will
know more about this only when the IIMs send the scorecards.
While analysing the difficulty level of the paper, we
at T.I.M.E. have not lost sight of the fundamental issue
that a lot of students find some questions easier outside
the exam hall but would not have answered those questoins
during the test.
Given below are the estimated cut-offs for the CAT2004
paper.
|
|
Section-I |
Section-II |
Section-III |
|
Area |
DI/DS/Reasoning |
Quant. |
RC/Verbal |
|
Good number of attempts |
19-20
questions |
19-20 questions |
30-34 questions |
|
Good Score |
14-15 marks |
14-15 marks |
25-26 marks |
|
Cut-offs |
9-11 marks |
9-11 marks |
17-18 marks |
When judging the suitability of a candidate, the IIMs
consider academic performance and work experience in
addition to CAT performance. However, considering only
CAT performance, the following are the scores required
to get IIM calls.
Total score required for one IIM Call: 53-54 marks
Total score required for 3-4 IIM calls: 56-57 marks
Total score required for all 6 calls: 60 marks
Please note that all students who get the above
scores may not get calls because the IIMs are expected
to consider different parameters like weightages for
work-experience, academics as well as for various sections
in the paper.
The other institutes taking CAT will very obviously
have lower cut-offs.
Now that CAT is over, make sure that your focus is on
your preparation for XAT and other management exams
that you are writing as well as on your preparation
for Group Discussions and Interviews.
Wish you all the best from the entire T.I.M.E. team.


|